Introduction:
In contract law, the concept of consideration plays a vital role in establishing the enforceability and validity of a contract. Consideration refers to something of value that is exchanged between parties involved in a contract. It is an essential element that distinguishes a binding agreement from a mere promise. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of consideration in contract law as per the Indian Contract Act, along with various scenarios that illustrate different types of consideration.
Key Elements of Consideration:
Bilateral Nature: Consideration must involve a mutual exchange between the parties. Both parties must provide something of value to each other.
Valuable and Sufficient: Consideration must have some value in the eyes of the law. It should be something that a reasonable person would consider as beneficial or desirable.
Legal and not Illusory: Consideration must be legal and possible to perform. It should not be a past consideration (already completed) or a mere illusion without any real substance.
Types of Consideration:
Executed Consideration: This type of consideration refers to an act or performance that has already been completed before the formation of the contract. It is a past consideration and generally does not hold legal weight unless it is a formal deed.
Executory Consideration: Executory consideration is a promise to perform an act or deliver something in the future. The consideration is not yet fully performed by one or both parties at the time of contract formation. This type of consideration is commonly found in most contracts.
Unilateral Consideration: Unilateral consideration arises when one party promises to do something in exchange for the other party's performance or forbearance. The consideration flows only from one side.
Mutual Consideration: Mutual consideration occurs when each party promises to provide something of value to the other party. It involves a two-way exchange, and both parties are bound by their promises.
Adequacy of Consideration: Under contract law, the adequacy of consideration is generally not a determining factor for the enforceability of a contract. As long as there is some consideration of value, the court does not typically question the fairness or equivalence of the exchange.